RARABIE AHMEDFOR BENCHER · 2026
Campaign perspective · November 10, 2026

A Voice for the
Criminal Law Bar.

Defence counsel. Crown prosecutors. A shared commitment to professional standards and the public interest.

Rabie Ahmed, candidate for Bencher of the Law Society of Alberta

Voting is open. If this perspective resonates, I would be grateful for your support. See all priorities & how to vote ↗

CLICK HERE TO VOTE NOW ↗

From my experience in criminal defence practice, I believe modern approaches to conflicts and ethical walls can help protect clients while expanding access to justice.

Criminal defence counsel and Crown prosecutors work from different responsibilities within the same justice system. Sound judgment, professional independence, fair process and public confidence matter across that work.

From my own criminal defence practice, I know the pressures of urgent hearings, demanding files and serious responsibilities to clients and the courts. I want that experience to inform the conversations we have about our profession.

Conflict rules, ethical walls and access to justice

As a criminal defence lawyer, I have seen how conflict-of-interest rules can affect independent practices, particularly lawyers in smaller firms or those sharing office space. Protecting confidentiality, loyalty and the public interest is essential. But I also think we need to talk about whether the way these rules apply reflects how criminal lawyers actually work.

In my view, modernizing the approach to ethical walls and independent office-sharing arrangements could create more opportunities for people to access justice. Where genuinely effective safeguards can protect a client's interests, they may allow more independent defence lawyers to remain available to take on cases, rather than unnecessarily narrowing the pool of counsel.

That matters to clients. Having more qualified counsel available can mean a better chance of finding representation, fewer delays and fewer practical barriers to obtaining legal help—especially in communities where criminal defence options are limited. Of course, an ethical wall is not a solution to every conflict, and safeguards must be more than arrangements on paper.

To me, this is a conversation worth having with the criminal defence bar: how do we uphold the profession's obligations while recognizing modern practice and strengthening access to justice? I would welcome the experiences and perspectives of colleagues who encounter these challenges in their own practices.

The realities of small and medium firms

In solo, small and medium firms, courtroom advocacy often sits alongside staffing, supervision, technology, overhead and administration. There may be no separate department to manage each new requirement. Those realities should inform how professional standards are explained and supported.

Practical guidance, relevant professional development and meaningful mentorship help firms maintain competence and serve clients well. Understanding the conditions in which legal services are delivered strengthens regulation in the public interest.

A strong criminal justice system

An independent defence bar and fair, effective prosecution both matter to public confidence in justice. Criminal lawyers understand what delay, disclosure challenges and barriers to obtaining counsel mean in practice.

I believe the Law Society should engage with practising lawyers, the courts and government on issues affecting the profession and the delivery of legal services. That engagement should draw on experience across the criminal law bar while remaining firmly guided by the Law Society’s public-interest mandate.

Mentorship that carries into the courtroom

Junior lawyers benefit from experienced colleagues who help them develop ethical judgment, advocacy skills and confidence. Practical learning about courtroom practice, disclosure and digital evidence can support lawyers throughout their careers, in private firms and in public service.

“The profession is strongest when its regulation reflects both the public interest and the realities of modern practice.”

That is the perspective I hope to bring to the Bencher table: thoughtful engagement, meaningful mentorship and an understanding of the everyday realities of criminal practice. With voting taking place November 10–17, I would be grateful for your support and your vote.

Rabie AhmedCandidate for Bencher · Law Society of Alberta
VOTE NOW · OFFICIAL eBALLOT ↗